"How I Learned to Love The New World Order," by Senator Joe Biden

There are few persons in U.S. leadership the last 50 years more committed to the New World Order (world government) than Joe Biden. So committed that on April 23, 1992, then Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s European Affairs Subcommittee, published in the Wall Street Journal, “How I Learned to Love the New World Order.” In it he expressed a need for a “permanent commitment of forces for use by the Security Council”—a U.N. standing army adding, “Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter?” His plans would destroy national sovereignty and establish world government over all nations under the United Nations.

Of course a standing army empowers the UN beyond the ability of any participating state to resist, including the United States. Its failure to have a standing army and the Constitution, forbidding a government over it, are the reasons we are not already ruled by a world government. It is the one thing left prohibiting such.. Without an army it cannot enforce its will; with one it can. To advance its causes it must depend upon persuasion of a majority of nations, rather than brute force. That is the breath of life Biden was referencing.

For America such would nullify the Constitution, which Biden has many times sworn to uphold, particularly the Declaration of Independence. Few Americans want world government. America would be subject to the whims of the majority of nations of which very few endow their people with any specific rights of FREEDOM FROM THE GOVERNMENT, as does ours. Liberty would evaporate from the planet.

This was no fluke position. In a speech as Vice President to the Export-Import Bank conference in Washington, D.C. April 5, 2013, he reiterated that theme. “The affirmative task we have now is to, um, create a new world order, because the global order is changing again.” The next year he told graduating cadets of the U.S. Air Force Academy Class of 2014. “You, your class has an incredible window of opportunity to lead in shaping a new world order for the 21st century.” In Davos 2017 he doubled down on the the same theme to billionaires gathered at the World Economic Forum. The theme showed up again in the Council on Foreign Relations January-February 2018 issue of Foreign Affairs co-authored with Michael Carpenter (“Pushing the Great Reset, William F. Jasper, The New American, March 22, 2021). If Biden is committed to anything, whether cognitively failing or not, it is world government.

The latest terminology used to advance world government now is the Great Reset endorsed by the world’s billionaires notably George Soros, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and articulated best by World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab in his book “COVID-19: The Great Reset.” To the question when things might return to normal he responded. “The short response is: never. Nothing will ever return to the ‘broken’ sense of normalcy that prevailed prior to the crisis because the coronavirus pandemic marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory” (Ibid. p. 13). Global trajectory is code for world government. Schwab was thus admitting that COVID was being used to advance rational for world government. LibertyUnderFire has published extensively on the use of climate change to advance the same objective. Both world health (pandemics) and world climate (disasters) need world government solutions, they falsely argue.

But it’s not just Biden who seeks to upend our constitutional republic with world government, his administration is brimming with those equally committed to the same; 32 thus far holding the highest offices in the executive branch (“Biden CFR-TC-BG Appointees,” The New American, March 22, 2021). It is the most world government (globalist) devoted administration in US history as measured by membership in the CFR, Bilderberg, and Trilateral Commission.

Donald Trump only had seven such members making him the least world government influenced president in 100 years. Because Trump performed the miracle of the century—getting elect—defeating “shoe-in” globalist favorite Hillary Clinton, every globalist on the planet crawled out of the collectivist sewer to destroy him.

But the world government threat cannot end without identifying the center of the secret combination to take over the globe—the Council on Foreign Relations. Their 100 year dominance of both major political parties, Republican and Democrat, stems from their infiltration of both, the media, and more recently the Internet (“Who Ran America Before Donald Trump,” LibertyUnderFire.com).

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) headquartered in New York city acknowledges its level of influence as “the nearest thing we have to a ruling establishment in the United States.” John J. McCloy, chairman of the CFR from 1953 to 1970 noted how his organization filled the positions of power in both parties with CFR members. “Whenever we needed a man we thumbed through the roll of the Council members and put through a call to New York.” Presumably McCloy filled the ranks of nine U.S. presidents in this manner.

That a similar process was in place when Barack Obama came to power in 2008 was verified by a October 6, 2008 WiikiLeaks email from CFR senior fellow Michael Froman to “Barack” providing him with a list of their selections “for senior level jobs in a potential Administration.” Not surprising ,“The cabinet list ended up being almost entirely on the money” (“Biden’s Non-diverse ‘Diversity’ Cabinet,” William F. Jasper, The New American). The same is almost certain for Biden as well.

Prior to Trump no one got to the top without their assistance. In 2020, through the most controversial presidential election in U.S. history, fraught with fraud foreign and domestic, the globalists have entrenched themselves once again with a man who loves the New World Order.

Dr. HDr. Harold W. Peasearold Pease is an expert on the United States Consitution and a syndicated columnist. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit http://www.LibertyUnderFire.org.

 

Reader Comments(0)